Message posted by vince white on August 02, 2009 at 17:45:03 PST:
this is a difficult message but the policy and atmosphere of DLR simply demands ethical response,
The purpose of this website is to provide truly timely and accurate news on advanced aircraft that are being tested or developed. Yet the truly advanced test objects are taboo under your policy. The observations and trip reports that stray and report objects in the forbidden and ridculed categories are by your policy not desired and if they are on discussion , they are subject to a withering ridicule . There has not been a genuine full diligence discussion on the sources many by very serious and responsible reporters as George Knapp of KLAS on the categories of test objects reported by very serious reporters. No not all strange objects pictures are fuzzy as one of the ignorant posts Ridiculing such objects reported time to re evaluate what copmpetent observers report. Was the late Gordon cooper not seeing clearly when he reported saucer landing at Edwards with film taken. ? that report would be taboo on DLR, BUT the question remains was he seeing ours or theirs ? time for review and some honeste exam, real honest exam- on these issues
I visit DLR Daily multiple visits but this policy is
going to have you quite behind the curve, for things
fly outof N Edwards, Tejon, TTR, Pine Gap, Kirtland
occasionally Palmdale, Warton BAE LM special prjects UK , ft Hood that if directed to DLR are not given a true examination. the risk is the chagtrin when secrecy fails and you play catchup---why is gravity R& D still black after 50 years. time for assumption
checking, your policy is obsolete. -done a lot a lot of homework what is the fluxliner ? vince white
Replies: