Message posted by gary on March 29, 2002 at 20:13:27 PST:

Interesting article from a number of viewpoints. One, it now confirms the b1b is not history. Two, it mentions a new missle being added to the b1b, i.e. "air-to-surface standoff missile". And lastly, what I found the most interesting:

For Operation Enduring Freedom, it has been the B-1B Lancer that has done the lion's share of the work, dropping nearly 40 percent of the ordnance, while flying only 5 percent of the strike sorties.

Replies:

• Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) Russ 03/30/2002, 4:47:20 PST (9)
  • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) gary 03/30/2002, 12:10:26 PST (8)
    • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) John 04/01/2002, 15:56:43 PST (0)
    • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) LN 03/30/2002, 16:14:36 PST (5)
      • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) gary 03/30/2002, 19:48:02 PST (4)
        • Long Shot 96 LN 04/02/2002, 6:20:31 PST (2)
          • Re: Long Shot 96 gary 04/02/2002, 22:18:28 PST (1)
            • Re: Long Shot 96 LN 04/02/2002, 23:48:43 PST (0)
        • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) Richard 04/01/2002, 14:43:34 PST (0)
    • Re: b1b article (not a51 related, but probably of interest to the forum) Russ 03/30/2002, 12:19:46 PST (0)