Message posted by Steve Douglass on October 23, 2013 at 13:46:19 PST:
Uh - yeah. You talked to your friend but you didn't ask him what the TFR was concerning? I also doubt that there would be any written directive to "vigorously document" other craft going into the airspace. Key word there was "written." My question - how does one document vigorously? I'm reminded of the first F-117 crash near Bakersfield in 1986. Controllers were advised to keep low overflights out of the airspace - but there was no written directives in that case either. As for allowing overflights above 12k - to establish a TFR any lower would more than signal something special was going on - at least in my opinion anyway. FYI: There is no attempt to make things dramatic - just to report the facts as I know them - which isn't much - and that in itself is curious. I'm sure very soon a press release will be issued that will make all the drama go away - and StealthMaster can say "I told you so." PS: No one has claimed seeing little green men or zombies, flying triangles or MIBs. Now that would be dramatic!
There was a TFR - to 5,000 feet - and that only called more attention to the crash.
In Reply to: Re: TFR in Western New Mexico raises eyebrows .. posted by The stealth master on October 23, 2013 at 12:43:26 PST:
Replies: