Message posted by TheSkunkWorks on November 12, 2010 at 7:23:00 PST:

Well not to be cocky in the least or sound like an a== or put u down but 340 ft is much longer than a fb field which is 300. No offense in the least :) So who knows. And ya i agree and never thought about it, does the Army use Groom for anything ever? Hmm nowadays i wonder.

In Reply to: Re: Is this what the Large Hanger is intended for? posted by FosterVS on November 12, 2010 at 6:43:54 PST:

Replies:

• Re: Is this what the Large Hanger is intended for? TheSkunkWorks 11/12/2010, 7:28:30 PST (8)
  • Re: Is this what the Large Hanger is intended for? Gimbal 11/12/2010, 8:30:52 PST (7)
    • Re: Is this what the Large Hanger is intended for? CFL2009 11/12/2010, 10:33:20 PST (6)
      • New Hangar use.... greatguess 11/12/2010, 11:39:44 PST (5)
        • Re: New Hangar use.... Peter Merlin 11/12/2010, 13:59:05 PST (4)
          • Re: New Hangar use.... gordy 11/12/2010, 17:40:04 PST (0)
          • Re: New Hangar use.... greatguess 11/12/2010, 16:23:10 PST (1)
            • Re: New Hangar use.... Peter Merlin 11/13/2010, 16:27:41 PST (0)
          • Re: New Hangar use.... TheSkunkWorks 11/12/2010, 15:49:39 PST (0)