Message posted by Steve Douglass on August 23, 2010 at 11:52:46 PST:

I'm confused - are you referring to the article (itself) being silly - or Bill Scott's writing history and your opinion of them stretching the bounds of reality?

So - the article isn't silly - but based on your readings you think he is?

You are entitled to your opinion -"silly" - but I think it was mistakenly attached to the article which isn't silly at all.

-Steve

In Reply to: Re: In Defense .. posted by Ron on August 23, 2010 at 11:06:12 PST:

Replies:

• Re: In Defense .. Ron 08/23/2010, 14:19:20 PST (4)
  • Re: In Defense .. Steve Douglass 08/23/2010, 19:04:57 PST (3)
    • Re: In Defense .. Robert 08/23/2010, 20:23:34 PST (2)
      • Re: In Defense .. olowy 08/24/2010, 0:37:29 PST (1)
        • Re: In Defense .. reeb88 08/24/2010, 17:45:26 PST (0)