Message posted by vince white on June 20, 2010 at 17:22:32 PST:

Re IFF problem.; Stealth Blimps vs unknown big black deltas
/ triangles / and other non transponder vehicles.
Ethics demands no reporter can “cherry pick “ the details Of an observation thus making the observed objct falsely reflect It’s nature. Details that fit the easy out, the explaining away . or ignoring
The actual object. To fit pet prejudice of observers.

If one examines the huge database of NIDS or lookat Rich Dolans analysis one finds the stealth blimb to be nonsense.The Belgian sightings must be engaged and the performance profiles dealt with.eg

But the F-16s – the top interceptors in the world – were completely outclassed by the triangular craft. Not only could it accelerate at incredible speeds, not only could it stop on a dime, but it could change its altitude almost instantly. At one point, for example, radar installations and amazed witnesses observed the triangle to drop about 4,000 feet in one second. That’s nearly a mile.
Moreover, this object moved intelligently, at least in the opinion of the Belgian Air Force Chief of Operations, Colonel Wilfried De Brouwer, who stated "There was a logic in the movements of the UFO." Nick Pope, who soon after this manned the "UFO Desk" in Britain’s Ministry of Defense, had contacts within the Belgian government who "elicited the conclusion that a structured craft had flown over Belgium that night." They had no idea, they said, of what that object was. [4]
Like the other triangles people have seen, the Belgian object was real enough. The real question is, to whom did it belong?
The ywar 2000 sightings near st Louis were similarly able to streak to a horizon
In a three eyeblinks. This is not stalth bimp behavior When wil some stare honestly at the data and reelly do do honestly report. those who pilot these
ships with risk deserve no less truth
vince white

In Reply to: big enough to land on? posted by Hamster on June 11, 2010 at 22:42:58 PST:

Replies: