Message posted by aaron johnson on July 06, 2004 at 12:25:33 PST:

Too both peter and boris it is rather strange in my opinion that both of you havent even done your home work on the matter of roswell. I find it strange that a technological leap did happen in the area of electronics after the 50's and continues too the present.

Yes boris it's true that all techy gadgets that we humans make, are made by flesh blood beings like ourselves. No Duh!

Mr. Merlin you have stated in your post that other's have seen saucer shaped craft and therefore are validating the phenomena yourself! oops!.

Yes!, Boris there are those who will try to and there will be those who will profit from the roswell incident and or any incident. No Duh!

1. Question why did a Major named Jesse Marcel state that a saucer craft was recovered at it's crash site?

EVIDENCE A.

Roswell Daily Record, July 8th, 1947:

RAAF CAPTURES FLYING SAUCER ON RANCH IN ROSWELL REGION
No Details of Flying Disk Are Revealed
Roswell Hardware Man and Wife Report Disk Seen

The intelligence office of the 509th Bombardment group at Ros- well Army Air Field announced at noon today, that the field has come into possession of a flying saucer.

According to information re- leased by the department, over authority of Maj. J. A. Marcel, intelligence officer, the disk was recovered on a ranch in the Ros- well vicinity, after an unidentified rancher had notified sheriff Geo. Wilcox, here, that he had found the instrument on his premises.

Major Marcel and a detail from his department went to the ranch and recovered the disk, it was stated.

Question #2 Why did one philip corso author a book documenting his involvement of taking the recovered parts of the roswell crashed vehicle and giving them to industries to reproduce and utilize as able too?

Question #3 Why is it, as to what is known as art's parts that are alleged to be from the roswell crash, Upon scientific analysis were constructed in a manner not known by current manufacturing techniques and or capabilities?

ah yes!, Reality!, is a lot more remarkable than we think it is.

AD INEXPLORATA
(too explore the unknown)
Aaron J.

In Reply to: Re: Technological Jump posted by Boris Maryshev on July 06, 2004 at 2:44:17 PST:

Replies:

• Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair spectators Peter Merlin 07/06/2004, 14:38:05 PST (7)
  • Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair (response) Aaron Johnson 07/06/2004, 17:20:00 PST (6)
    • Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair (response) The Observer 07/07/2004, 21:06:26 PST (4)
      • Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair (response 2) aaron johnson 07/07/2004, 21:34:08 PST (3)
        • Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair (response 2) The Observer 07/07/2004, 21:48:30 PST (2)
          • Re: Technological - debunking ok next time they crash i'll make sure a signed note is left or was there? Aaron Johnson 07/08/2004, 0:24:38 PST (1)
            • Re: Technological - debunking ok next time they crash i'll make sure a signed note is left or was there? The Observer 07/08/2004, 15:21:03 PST (0)
    • Re: Technological Jump debunking armchair (response) Joerg (Webmaster) 07/06/2004, 19:30:16 PST (0)
• Roswell (Re: Technological Jump) Andreas Parsch 07/06/2004, 12:52:25 PST (8)
  • Re: Roswell (Re: Technological Jump) debunking the arm chair guys Aaron Johnson 07/06/2004, 16:24:20 PST (1)
    • Re: debunking the arm chair guys Andreas Parsch 07/07/2004, 0:26:26 PST (0)
  • Re: Roswell (Re: Technological Jump) HomerS3 07/06/2004, 13:00:22 PST (5)
    • Re: Roswell Andreas Parsch 07/06/2004, 13:20:43 PST (4)
      • Re: Roswell...hello... Chris M 07/06/2004, 17:32:34 PST (3)
        • Re: Roswell...hello... Sundog 07/06/2004, 18:27:44 PST (2)
          • Re: Roswell concerning Large UFO & psyop (reponse) Aaron Johnson 07/06/2004, 20:14:11 PST (0)
          • Re: Roswell...hello... correction on Issac Asimov statement Aaron Johnson 07/06/2004, 18:45:28 PST (0)