Message posted by Jose on February 24, 2001 at 04:28:17 EST:

Gary

Check it out!

I got Commander X's Conspiracy Journal Newsletter via email last night.

Jose
========================

HAARP Transmitter Now Running At Full Power - By Marshall Smith - BJNews

As of the morning of Saturday Feb 17, 2001, HAARP began doing testing with
greatly increased FULL power. The transmitter can now be heard all day
long on 3.39 MHz. Very early this morning about 3 AM, HAARP could be heard
at it's "old" normal signal strength. About 4 AM the signal changed in
both its pulse timing and inter-pulse spacing. At 4:30 AM the signal
strength suddenly increased tremendously.

Unlike previous mornings, there was no regular F-layer daytime fade out
when the sun rose here in California about 6:45 AM. I continued to monitor
during the daylight. I have never heard the HAARP signal during the
daytime before. The sun rises in Gakona Alaska about 10 AM PST. The
received signal again increased from about S5 to S9 at 10:05 AM. With
sunlight at both the transmitter and receiver there is no F-layer skip to
bend the signal around the planet. This means this is an extremely
powerful direct groundwave signal. And I'm only receiving the leakage off
the sidelobes of the antenna array.

The full HAARP design power is supposed to be about 350 Megawatts. But
that is only the published spec, not necessarily what is done in practice.
There is a planned Air Force "Star Wars" test with two vehicles, one from
California and the other in the south Pacific, similar to last summer's
failed test. The tentative published launch is set for late March or
April. I will monitor HAARP to confirm it is running full power during the
launch, as it was last summer.

Last summer's "failure" is exactly what a HAARP device is supposed to do;
destroy the electronic controls of a vehicle so the second stage cannot
separate from the booster. A very cheap, simple way to knock down missiles
launched from anywhere on the planet. It also can destroy military
satellites in low orbit. Maybe that's why the Russians and Chinese have
been complaining in the last several weeks about Bush's intention to
"build" the star wars system. Maybe they've been losing some of their
"secret hardware." But of course, they won't say that in public.

Its now 11 AM PST, on Saturday the 17th, and the signal is blasting in
with the powerful pre-pulse tone around S+20 and the main signal about S9.
The signal varies 3 to 6 db over a series of several pulses. Since this is
not due to F-layer skip fading, I must assume they are slewing the beam of
the antenna in various directions, and thus changing the amount of the
sidelobes in this direction. This must be a test of a simulated space
warfare game with multiple targets. Rapid slewing of the antenna in just a
matter of a minute or two is not useful for submarine communication, nor
for their stated purpose of doing "ionospheric research."

To show the HAARP signal is abnormally large, at this time, the 80 meter
band is silent and WWV at 5 MHz cannot be heard, as would be expected
during the daytime. WWV at 10 MHz is barely heard but does not even
register on the S meter. Tuning back to 3.39 MHz, the S meter jumps off
the top of the scale. Even Russian woodpeckers never did that, and they
were aimed along the ground not out into space. I have no way to estimate
how many Gigawatts that represents.

It may be only coincidence but just several days ago, Russia announced it
will be conducting a massive space war game, including the launch of
numerous missiles, from both ground sites and submarines. Of course this
is only a coincidence. You Think. Check out the details in Bill Gertz's
article Russian forces conduct massive war-games exercise
(http://washingtontimes.com/national/default-2001215225141.htm).

For more information about HAARP, how the transmitter works and to hear
what the transmitter sounds like, go back to the front page
(www.brojon.com) article about the HAARP facility and follow the links
there.
Copyright © 2001 BJNews & TeddySpeaks Foundation, Inc

In Reply to: Re: haarp wave file posted by F105THUD on February 23, 2001 at 15:17:45 EST:

Replies: