Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake?
Message posted by Magoo on November 09, 2003 at 15:12:10 PST:
I don't think it is Groom. For one thing, in the pic it looks as though the debris and POL trail comes from the right of picture. If that were Groom, judging by the terrain in the background the pic is looking east-south east towards Range 61/Tikaboo, which means the aircraft would have had to have approached that position from the west or north west which would be unlikely due to the mountains in that direction.Nice pic though....ouch!
Magoo
In Reply to: Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? posted by Wildweasel on November 09, 2003 at 14:56:06 PST:
Replies:
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? Wildweasel 11/10/2003, 11:30:20 PST
(9)
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? Tom 11/10/2003, 18:59:11 PST
(1)
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? zipper 11/10/2003, 15:36:36 PST
(0)
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? Magoo 11/10/2003, 13:44:45 PST
(0)
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? Joerg (Webmaster) 11/10/2003, 12:36:09 PST
(3)
- Re: Ancient History: X-15 Landing at Mud Lake, Or Was It Groom Lake? Wildweasel 11/10/2003, 11:34:55 PST
(0)
[ Discussion Forum Index ] [ FAQ ]