[OT] Re: What's Next, QX-71?


Message posted by Andreas Parsch on April 07, 2003 at 0:28:52 PST:

> No, not quite "QX-71." Though I have seen the
> "designation "X-151."

So have I. It has the same base in reality as my "QX-71". For a fascinating _real_ aircraft, look for "X-15-1" instead :-)

> From an inside Skunk Works sources (previous
> employee), which reported the designation "XR-71"
> for one the programs at Groom.

No comment ;-)

Andreas


In Reply to: What's Next, QX-71? posted by wolfbane on April 06, 2003 at 20:30:56 PST:

Replies:



[ Discussion Forum Index ] [ FAQ ]