Message posted by gary on December 11, 2000 at 00:39:16 EST:
Here is KASZA V BROWNER The ruling is pretty long. Then again, so is the URL. ;-) Some interesting lines: The facility is referred to for purposes of these actions as "the operat- Once discovery got underway, the Air Force refused to fur- Although a viable dispute may have lingered over the
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/04485f8dcbd4e1ea882569520074e698/4d3bee2665b6828e88256958006e98db?OpenDocument
ing location near Groom Lake."
nish almost all of the information requested on the ground that
it was privileged.
name of the operating location near Groom Lake, no genuine
dispute existed as to the place that was the subject of the
inventory and inspection.
In Reply to: Anyone look up these law suits posted by gary on December 10, 2000 at 23:51:45 EST:
Replies: