Message posted by Joerg (Webmaster) on November 27, 2000 at 00:52:42 EST:

Thanks for the update, zipper. Thats a pretty substantial increase, and I can't find a reason in the amendment. Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the original purpose as a practice field for field supply missions.

Now this is becoming quite a good size air field. Is it at all possible we are not being told the entire truth?? ;-)

In Reply to: Cedar Pass Airfield posted by zipper on November 26, 2000 at 17:27:33 EST:

Replies:

• Re: Cedar Pass Airfield zipper 11/27/2000, 11:04:35 EST (2)
  • Re: Cedar Pass Airfield Joerg (Webmaster) 11/27/2000, 15:21:36 EST (1)
    • Re: Cedar Pass Airfield Keith 11/27/2000, 17:14:37 EST (0)