Re: New Hangar


Message posted by Noone on November 25, 2010 at 10:11:34 PST:

Thanks.

My guess is that it isn't for simply "another" UAV/UCAV. That level of infrastructure investment doesn't occur for something similar to what's already in place.

My guess is it's for the follow on to either the current manned bomber fleet.

Strike attack is now done via UCAVs, recon is done by UAVs, long range transport has nothing secret about it to warrant that infrastructure.

Only the next stealth bomber could?


In Reply to: Re: New Hangar posted by Gimbal on November 25, 2010 at 5:24:24 PST:

Replies:



[ Discussion Forum Index ] [ FAQ ]